One site is a project. Forty is a portfolio problem.
Multi-site estates, charge point operators, manufacturers and utilities face the same issue: no consolidated view of consumption, no consistent control layer, and flexible capacity spread thinly across sites that were never designed to work together.
Three portfolios we'd expect to help.
No consolidated view across the estate
Each site has its own supplier data, its own meter and its own spreadsheet. Nobody can say which sites are worst, or where investment would pay back fastest.
Idle capacity between charging sessions
Connections are sized for peak simultaneous charging, which happens rarely. For most of the day significant capacity sits unused and unearning.
Flexibility spread across several plants
Individual process loads are flexible within limits, but no single plant is large or predictable enough to be worth a market conversation on its own.
Consistent data model
Every site, every asset, one structure, so portfolio reporting is possible at all.
Per-site constraints
Control boundaries defined and enforced locally at each site, not centrally assumed.
One commercial relationship
Portfolio pricing on request, rather than a separate negotiation per site.
No platform lock-in
Market targets enter through one controlled interface, so the route to market can change.
Let's look at the whole estate.
Send a site list and consumption data and we'll come back with where the opportunity concentrates.
Energy Intelligence